📺Complete Domestic Raft Analysis and Design
Posted on September 23rd, 2020 in Analysis
Summary
The provided excerpts detail the methodology for the finite element analysis (FEA) and design of a raft foundation for a small house incorporating two-story, single-story, and garage sections, using the Master Series software.
The design process involved several key stages:
1. Model Setup and Geometry
- Software and Import: The process began by starting the Master Series software, creating a new file, and importing an AutoCAD drawing as a CAD layer.
- Filtering CAD Layers: Layers such as dimensions, text, and small partitions (Def points related to small partitions) were highlighted and excluded from the display, leaving essential elements like walls and hatching.
- Creating the Slab and Members: The outline of the structure was created using concrete members, initially. Additional lines were added internally to represent wall loading and the centres of drop slabs.
- Openings and Coordinates: A few openings were created, although very small ones might typically be ignored. The model's coordinates were adjusted to bring all points back down to the origin (zero-zero point) for cleanliness. The external members were then converted into the FE slab.
2. Slab Properties and Attached Beams
- Material Specification: The slab surface properties were edited, setting codified material properties (Eurocode). The slab was specified as C30 concrete with a 200 mm thickness. For service cases, a modulus of elasticity of 0.25 was assumed.
Defining Attached Beams (Thickening): Attached beams were designated around the perimeter and along internal lines.
- The section was defined as rectangular.
- The slab thickness was increased from 200 mm to 350 mm in these areas, meaning an additional depth of 150 mm was added.
- The width of thickening was set to 600 mm (150 mm either side of the 300 mm wall width).
- Beam Design Integration: Later in the design phase, the attached beams were treated as combined plates, where a 600 mm width of the slab was ignored when designing the slab reinforcement spanning in that direction, as the beam was catering for it .
3. Supports and Loading
Raft Support (Soil Interaction): The foundation was modeled as a raft resting on soil, meaning initially there were no restraints .
- A subgrade modulus (or subgrade reaction) was set; initially 25,000, deemed reasonable for stiff soil, and later reduced to 10,000 to observe the effect of a broader spread of soil take-up .
- The soil support was set to compression only, allowing for uplift if required .
- Additional supports were placed to stabilize the slab horizontally and prevent rotation .
Loading Application: Various dead and live loads were applied to the surface:
- Full area loads included dead load (screed) of -1.2 and a live load of 2.5 everywhere . The self-weight of the slab was automatically included .
- Line loads were applied for walls (e.g., 2-story double leaf wall load was -18 kN, single-story double leaf was -9 kN, and a single leaf load was -4.5 kN) [
Summary with Timestamps
This table summarizes the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and design process for the raft foundation as detailed in the sources, including the corresponding timestamps.
| Start Time | End Time | Summary of Action/Concept |
| 00:00:07,440 | 00:00:18,800 | Introduction: Overview of the project—designing a raft foundation for a small house incorporating two-story, single-story, and garage sections. |
| 00:00:19,800 | 00:00:43,600 | Discussion of calculated loading values (e.g., double skin leaves) and launching the Master Series software/creating a new file. |
| 00:01:06,000 | 00:01:22,720 | Importing the AutoCAD drawing as a CAD layer under the viewing menu. |
| 00:01:25,880 | 00:02:20,480 | Filtering CAD Layers: Excluding unnecessary layers (dimensions, text, Def points related to small partitions) while retaining walls and hatching. |
| 00:02:41,800 | 00:03:14,440 | Creating the external outline of the structure using concrete members (using the polyline tool). |
| 00:03:16,160 | 00:04:13,890 | Adding internal lines to represent potential wall loading and the centers of drop slabs. |
| 00:04:23,800 | 00:04:43,440 | Creating openings within the slab outline, noting that very small openings are sometimes ignored. |
| 00:04:48,200 | 00:07:01,440 | Geometry Refinement: Adjusting member coordinates (setting common Z value) and pulling all points back down to the origin (zero-zero point) for cleanliness, followed by converting the external members into the FE slab. |
| 00:07:26,080 | 00:07:53,920 | Material Definition: Setting the slab material to C30 concrete with a 200 mm thickness and specifying codified materials (Eurocode) for design. |
| 00:08:02,560 | 00:08:12,800 | Setting the modulus of elasticity to 0.25 for service cases. |
| 00:08:13,680 | 00:09:07,040 | Designating attached beams (thickening) around the perimeter and along internal lines. |
| 00:09:22,200 | 00:10:00,000 | Attached Beam Properties: Defining beams as rectangular, adding an additional depth of 150 mm (total thickness 350 mm), and setting the width of thickening to 600 mm (150 mm either side of the 300 mm wall width). |
| 00:12:04,480 | 00:12:22,800 | Support Setup (Soil Interaction): Modeling the foundation as a raft (no restraints), setting the initial subgrade modulus (subgrade reaction) to 25,000 for stiff soil. |
| 00:13:31,160 | 00:13:38,240 | Setting the soil support to compression only, allowing for uplift if required. |
| 00:13:44,360 | 00:14:12,800 | Adding two additional supports (without vertical reaction) to stabilize the slab horizontally and prevent rotation. |
| 00:14:41,720 | 00:15:34,920 | Area Loading: Applying full area loads: Dead load (screed) of -1.2 and Live load of 2.5 (self-weight is automatically included). |
| 00:15:47,680 | 00:17:28,569 | Applying line loads for two-story double leaf walls at -18 kN. |
| 00:17:40,080 | 00:18:14,480 | Applying line loads for single-story double leaf walls at -9 kN. |
| 00:18:24,800 | 00:19:14,720 | Applying a third line load (single leaf wall load) at -4.5 kN. |
| 00:19:39,440 | 00:22:17,680 | Applying first-floor loads (UDLs: Dead -2.8, Live 7; Point Loads: Dead -16.5, Live -41). |
| 00:22:24,160 | 00:23:52,520 | Applying upper roof loads (Line Loads: Dead -6.2, Live -6.5). |
| 00:24:18,720 | 00:26:45,040 | Alternate Loading Patterns: Creating surface patterns (Set 1 and Set 2, plus Set 3 and Set 4 for the opposite direction) using dummy members to delineate loading areas. |
| 00:27:06,080 | 00:28:30,340 | Importing Eurocode loading cases (1.35 FE) as a replacement set, establishing 10 loading combinations (max, min, service, etc.). |
| 00:29:34,040 | 00:29:55,680 | Reviewing global settings (default 1 meter mesh) and meshing the surface for analysis. |
| 00:30:09,440 | 00:33:41,520 | Adjusting mesh intensity: Applying local mesh intensities (e.g., 0.05) near problematic areas (openings close to beams) and finally setting the global mesh to 0.25 to achieve a suitable mesh. |
| 00:34:19,880 | 00:34:37,600 | Reviewing shell elements results, noting very little error (2% overall error), confirming the model is very good for FEA. |
| 00:35:58,640 | 00:36:47,760 | Reviewing spring reactions, showing that the stiffness of the subgrade modulus is taking up most of the load near the structure (up to 100 kN). |
| 00:37:05,600 | 00:37:35,600 | Subgrade Modulus Adjustment: Reducing the subgrade modulus from 25,000 to 10,000 and re-analyzing, resulting in more spread/take-up of soil further out and a slight chance of uplift in the middle panel. |
| 00:38:10,640 | 00:38:29,120 | Observing settlement results (up to 6 mil under ultimate load), noting that theoretical settlement under serviceability is similar due to creep/reduced flexural strength. |
| 00:40:15,280 | 00:40:46,880 | Attached Beam Design Integration: Updating properties to use combined plates, instructing the software to ignore 600 mm of slab width when designing reinforcement in that direction, as the beam will cater for it. |
| 00:41:08,240 | 00:41:52,440 | Starting concrete slab design: Setting top and bottom cover to 50 mm and defining the basic rebar default as 8s at 200 (252 mesh) to obtain initial failure points. |
| 00:52:59,920 | 00:53:45,280 | Resetting the basic reinforcement throughout the entire slab to 10s at 200 (top and bottom) for simplification and reappraising the design. |
| 00:55:02,560 | 00:56:07,520 | Adding a localized strip of additional steel (top, 10s at 200) to address YY Hogging (vertical direction) requirements, achieving good unity values (0.8, 0.9). |
| 00:56:15,200 | 00:57:42,890 | Adding a localized strip of bottom steel for YY Sagging, requiring 12s at 200 to satisfy capacity requirements in the critical area (influenced by point loads plus walls). |
| 00:59:04,440 | 01:00:28,960 | Exporting Results: Exporting the final slab design and reinforcement details to an AutoCAD drawing, showing the basic mesh plus additional strips where required. |
| 01:00:39,440 | 01:01:26,960 | Initiating Concrete Beam Design for the thickened edge beams: Setting minimum bars (10s) and cover (50 mm all round). |
| 01:04:31,760 | 01:05:04,320 | Modifying the beam design to ignore minor axis moments and torsion because these forces are assumed to be resisted by the main slab. |
| 01:05:37,000 | 01:06:35,360 | Finalizing beam reinforcement design using 100 mm bar centers to achieve the required capacity and minimum spacing. |
| 01:06:41,600 | 01:07:17,920 | Conclusion: Listing the Master Series components utilized in the project: Space Frame, Fine Elements, Concrete Beam Design, and Concrete Slab Design. |